LinksRUsBlog

Esoteric  views Even more off the record  views Private personally (off the record) Privater than private/More private than private: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unorganised_sector_(India) exclude_from_explicit_instantiation (https://quuxplusone.github.io/blog/2021/08/06/dont-explicitly-instantiate-std-templates/)  Seems that #-entites are 'more' private than private-entities, in some sense. :) The visibility of a method doesn't change which properties it's . https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/31670 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1299216/more-private-than-private-c https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ930162 More Private than Private Sector https://www.epw.in/journal/1970/50/business-uncategorised/more-private-private-sector.html Economic and Political Weekly https://www.epw.in › journal › business-uncategorised Dec 12, 1970 — More Private than Private Sector. Business · Vol. 5, Issue No. 50, 12 Dec, 1970. Updated on 12 December 1970. companies? Oct 21, 2019 ...

  But I also filter the above views through SLS subredditors views on that screenshot here

 In that article, Antiff says the following : "Todd May claims that Anarchists need to look back at classical “classical” figures from the nineteenth-century European wing of the movement .May suggested that  anarchists had yet to come to terms with power as a positive ground for action.  (positive power as in Marxism/Marxism Leninism) The anarchist project, he argued, is based on a fallacious “humanist” notion that “the human essence is a good essence, which relations of power suppress and deny.” This impoverished notion of power as ever oppressive, never productive, was the Achilles heel of anarchist political philosophy (ibid., 62). Hence May’s call for a new and improved “poststructuralist anarchism.”  The poststructuralist anarchist would not shy away from power: she would shed the husk of humanism the better to exercise power “tactically” within an ethical practice guided by Habermas’s universalist theory of communicative action (ibid., 146).  But in the p...

I can be described as a Post-Anarchist, as I do not have a set of social arrangements, or even any particular revolutionary project I engage in, but rather I have a sensibility, a specific ethos or way of living and observing the world which is impelled by me realizing the freedom that we currently posses.  It suggest that revolution – as a method of thinking of radical political changes – is no longer operational, and I propose a notion of insurrection instead – of which we distance ourselves from power, instead of us seeking to battle against it directly creating a new rule. In layman's terms, my strain of Post-anarchism is not one coherent theory, but rather my Anarchism of a combination of works of any amount of post-modernists and post-structuralists including Michel Foucault, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida, Jean Baudrillard; postmodern feminists including Judith Butler; and besides those, also of classical anarchist and libertarian philosophers including Zhuan...

Some people falsely think most Marxists are first world university Trotsyists and Anarcho radlibs. In reality the majority of Communist parties on Earth sustain at least some manner of Marxism-Leninism Anarchists and Libs are perfect for each other. Libs have only destroyed the planet and Anarchists have accomplished next to nothing. But hey they will convince the enemy with some mutual aid /s Anarchism is a radlib ideology There's a reason that essentially all of the worst radlibs are Anarchists. The whole anarchist philosophy is devoted to fighting abstract "hierarchy" instead of materially uplifting the workers, which means that from the outset, Anarchists are operating on an idealist framework instead of from a material framework So what this means is that Anarchism consummately itself to wokeness and the fuzzy radlib conceptions of "oppression" and "struggle". (though Karl Marx, Frederich Engels and Vladimir Lenin use these terms as well! They do ...