Exh myosdsodsio

Mythological Socialism/Communism is basically for all intents and purposes Communalism

Mythological Socialism/Communism has literally everyone being paid the same exact wages regardless of what job they do (like US pro athletes and CEOs having the same exact income as janitors and deputy dog catchers. No need to tax the rich when the rich wouldn’t exist under this system). In this system income is redistributed so that everyone always had the same amount of money as every other person

In Mythological Socialism/Communism people themselves are collectivized . Donated hair would be exported. There would be a more identifying National Id created for citizens. There would be less excessive high technology (between moderate Neo Luddism and Anti Consumerism) since high technology is capitalistic. Dozens of people would even sleep under the same huge blankets in communes. 

In Mythological Socialism/Communism there are elements of meme J-Stalinism

Unlike Marxism Leninism, Mythological Socialism/Communism would make real change for the better, and would be free of tyranny . Since some ideas of pure communism are a bit antiquated, this society would adjust for our contemporaries. How? Maybe through Acid communism as one way to do so. Acid Communism is base for imagining new futures and is thus compatible with my brand of post Anarchism

This society would also use a classical anarchism approach (including M Stirnerism/Egoism) as mentioned here

This society would use the Russian revolution as an alternative ground for theorizing and implementing the social conditions of freedom based on a critical understanding of power and liberation as perpetually co-mingling with and inscribed by a process of self-interrogation and self-overcoming that is pluralistic, individualist, materialist, and social. 

This society would be contemporary radical but marshal classical anarchism to interrogate poststructuralism implementations, rather than the other way around.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh GS wip

Criticism of George Soros is definitely warranted, even from a left wing POV. George Soros is an oligarch and we must fight against and abolish his oligarchy   Soros is not a communist. If he were? The riots/marches for example wouldn't have a strong lib (including rad lib) lean. https://twitter.com/kazweida/status/1306330224070553601 Also the 'To criticize George Soros is anti-semetic' smear hardly makes sense. This smear would make sense if the snarls were not too being stated by people who are pro-zionist or heck, jewish in nature. (Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro come to mind). But what is the reason that they are circling the wagons for a wall street scumbag at best like Soros who has also done a lot of damage to left wing causes at worst? The conservative misfits and fringe right does have an obsession with George Soros, scapegoating him for EVERYTHING. When people like the conservative misfits and fringe right are fanatically focused on demonizing extremely rich Jewish busin
Read more

LW 'consvor

This type of Left wing conservatism retroactively supports left wing social and economic policies being implemented and accepted, centuries, millennias many many many decades before they happened in our world. It is basically Novelitism  (off compass Progressivism) and  Reverse conservatism This type of Left wing conservatism contains  my alternative version of Cultural Marxism This type of left wing conservatism is a deja-vu type ideology . Like 'what old is new again'/ try something new Po st   Conserva tive It is to right wing conservatism what socialism is to capitalism ( see Fred Hampton quote here for what I mean). Maybe something like Urbanism It can also be described as sociological leftism, radicalist synthesis   futu rism  , Radical Leftism reddit, Maoist utopianism and or this type of postmodernism Like retroactively supporting same sex marriage being legalized in the US etc in the 1700s , 1800s or at the latest in the 1990s, in Europe in BC times, Middle Ages, In
Read more

Exh Anralib

Some people falsely think most Marxists are first world university Trotsyists and Anarcho radlibs. In reality the majority of Communist parties on Earth sustain at least some manner of Marxism-Leninism Anarchists and Libs are perfect for each other. Libs have only destroyed the planet and Anarchists have accomplished next to nothing. But hey they will convince the enemy with some mutual aid /s Anarchism is a radlib ideology There's a reason that essentially all of the worst radlibs are Anarchists. The whole anarchist philosophy is devoted to fighting abstract "hierarchy" instead of materially uplifting the workers, which means that from the outset, Anarchists are operating on an idealist framework instead of from a material framework So what this means is that Anarchism consummately itself to wokeness and the fuzzy radlib conceptions of "oppression" and "struggle". (though Karl Marx, Frederich Engels and Vladimir Lenin use these terms as well! They do
Read more